The Finch Formerly Known As Gold

27 May 2003

Equal distribution of miseries

James Joyner notes that regional variations mean nothing to the tax code:

$50,000 a year is big money in Podunk, Mississippi; it is near-poverty in Manhattan. But the two earners are treated identically for the purposes of federal income taxes. Which isn't particularly "progressive."

Of course, "progressive" isn't all that wonderful anyway, no matter how forward-looking and optimistic it sounds. And besides, Podunk is (or should be) in Iowa.

Posted at 9:45 PM to Political Science Fiction

Yeah. And if you write regional variations into the tax code, it suddenly goes from 20,000 volumes of impenetrable gobbledygook to 20,000,000 volumes of impenetrable gobbledygook.

OTOH, if the tax code could be made so bad that even lawyers can't understand it, maybe we could get real reform for a change.

Posted by: McGehee at 6:31 AM on 28 May 2003

I keep thinking, every time a new provision comes along, that maybe this will be the straw that sends the camel to the chiropractor, but somehow it never is.

Posted by: CGHill at 7:28 AM on 28 May 2003

They don't make camels like they used to. Dang titanium backbones...

Posted by: McGehee at 7:01 PM on 28 May 2003